Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio (TM) COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
Albert, Eliseo; Torres, Ignacio; Bueno, Felipe; Huntley, Dixie; Molla, Estefania; Angel Fernandez-Fuentes, Miguel; Martinez, Mireia; Poujois, Sandrine; Forque, Lorena; Valdivia, Arantxa; Solano de la Asuncion, Carlos; Ferrer, Josep; Colomina, Javier; Navar
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
2021
VL / 27 - BP / - EP /
abstract
Objectives: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio (TM) COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres. Methods: RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR. Results: Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD-) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7-100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0-88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4-99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9 -98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD- results (n = 11). Conclusion: The Panbio (TM) COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCRproven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious. (C) 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
-
347 InfluRatio
AccesS level
Bronze, Green published, Green submitted
MENTIONS DATA
Microbiology
-
0 Twitter
-
32 Wikipedia
-
0 News
-
438 Policy
Immunology
-
0 Twitter
-
32 Wikipedia
-
0 News
-
438 Policy
Among papers in Microbiology
Among papers in Immunology
39th
Influratio
350
Más información
Influscience
Rankings
- BETA VERSION