MENU

Effect of Canakinumab vs Placebo on Survival Without Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe COVID-19 A Randomized Clinical Trial

Caricchio, Roberto; Abbate, Antonio; Gordeev, Ivan; Meng, Jamie; Hsue, Priscilla Y.; Neogi, Tuhina; Arduino, Roberto; Fomina, Daria; Bogdanov, Roman; Stepanenko, Tatiana; Ruiz-Seco, Pilar; Gonzalez-Garcia, Andres; Chen, YU; Li, Yuhan; Whelan, Sarah; Noviel

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
2021
VL / 326 - BP / 230 - EP / 239
abstract
This clinical trial compares the efficacy of canakinumab vs placebo on survival without invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Importance Effective treatments for patients with severe COVID-19 are needed. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of canakinumab, an anti-interleukin-1 beta antibody, in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted at 39 hospitals in Europe and the United States. A total of 454 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, hypoxia (not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV]), and systemic hyperinflammation defined by increased blood concentrations of C-reactive protein or ferritin were enrolled between April 30 and August 17, 2020, with the last assessment of the primary end point on September 22, 2020. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion of canakinumab (450 mg for body weight of 40-<60 kg, 600 mg for 60-80 kg, and 750 mg for >80 kg; n = 227) or placebo (n = 227). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was survival without IMV from day 3 to day 29. Secondary outcomes were COVID-19-related mortality, measurements of biomarkers of systemic hyperinflammation, and safety evaluations. Results Among 454 patients who were randomized (median age, 59 years; 187 women [41.2%]), 417 (91.9%) completed day 29 of the trial. Between days 3 and 29, 198 of 223 patients (88.8%) survived without requiring IMV in the canakinumab group and 191 of 223 (85.7%) in the placebo group, with a rate difference of 3.1% (95% CI, -3.1% to 9.3%) and an odds ratio of 1.39 (95% CI, 0.76 to 2.54; P = .29). COVID-19-related mortality occurred in 11 of 223 patients (4.9%) in the canakinumab group vs 16 of 222 (7.2%) in the placebo group, with a rate difference of -2.3% (95% CI, -6.7% to 2.2%) and an odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.30 to 1.50). Serious adverse events were observed in 36 of 225 patients (16%) treated with canakinumab vs 46 of 223 (20.6%) who received placebo. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19, treatment with canakinumab, compared with placebo, did not significantly increase the likelihood of survival without IMV at day 29. Question Is the anti-interleukin-1 beta antibody canakinumab effective to treat patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and hyperinflammation? Finding This randomized clinical trial included 454 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and with elevated C-reactive protein or ferritin levels. Treatment with intravenous canakinumab vs placebo resulted in survival without IMV at 29 days of 88.8% vs 85.7%, a difference that was not statistically significant. Meaning Among patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19, treatment with canakinumab, compared with placebo, did not significantly increase the likelihood of survival without IMV.

AccesS level

MENTIONS DATA