Energy expenditure differences across lying, sitting, and standing positions in young healthy adults
Amaro-Gahete, Francisco J.; Sanchez-Delgado, Guillermo; Alcantara, Juan M. A.; Martinez-Tellez, Borja; Acosta, Francisco M.; Merchan-Ramirez, Elisa; Lof, Marie; Labayen, Idoia; Ruiz, Jonatan R.
PLOS ONE
2019
VL / 14 - BP / - EP /
abstract
The time spent in sedentary behaviour represents an important public health burden. To reduce sedentary time in the general population, the simplest, most effective, and most accessible method is to decrease lying and sitting time. We aimed to compare differences on energy expenditure (EE) across lying, sitting, and standing positions; and to analyse the associations between the change on EE of changing from one position to another and anthropometric and body composition parameters in young healthy adults. A total of 55 (69% women) young healthy adults aged 21.7 +/- 2.2 participated in the study. We measured EE by indirect calorimetry across lying, sitting, and standing positions following the standard procedures. The EE was significantly higher in standing than in both lying and sitting positions (mean difference: 0.121 +/- 0.292 and 0.125 +/- 0.241 kcal/min, respectively; all P<0.001), and no differences were observed between lying and sitting positions (P = 1.000). There was a negative association between the EE differences in sitting vs. standing position and lean body mass (P = 0.048), yet no associations between EE differences with the rest of the anthropometric and body composition parameters were observed in each position pair studied (all P>0.321). Our findings support the fact that increasing the time spent standing could be a simple strategy to slightly increase EE. Therefore, our results have important clinical implications including a better monitoring, characterizing, and promoting countermeasures to sedentariness through low-level physical activities.
MENTIONS DATA
Agricultural Sciences
-
0 Twitter
-
16 Wikipedia
-
0 News
-
37 Policy
Among papers in Agricultural Sciences
Más información
Influscience
Rankings
- BETA VERSION